AI Job Impacts Forecast

The provided chart, titled AI Job Impacts Forecast, illustrates the global trend of jobs gained versus jobs lost due to AI from 2023 through 2030.

Key Trends and Findings

  • Running Total Projection: The forecast tracks the global impact on jobs (excluding China and India) as a running total.

  • Initial Period (2023–2028): For the majority of the decade, the total number of jobs lost (dark blue line) is projected to exceed the number of jobs gained (orange line).

  • The Intersection Point: The forecast indicates a critical turning point around 2029, where the running total of jobs gained is expected to surpass jobs lost.

  • 2030 Outlook: By the end of the decade, the trajectory for jobs gained accelerates sharply, reaching a higher total volume (near 9,000,000) compared to the volume of jobs lost.

Strategic Context

This forecast complements other 2026 data, such as the high funding for GenAI (+38%) and AI (+36%), suggesting that while current implementations may lead to displacement, the long-term economic effect is projected to be a net creator of roles.

Based on the content by David Mayer and the associated research, the forecasts regarding AI’s impact on the workforce focus on a transition from simple automation to deep structural changes:

  • The Productivity Paradox: While AI is being funded primarily for productivity gains, Mayer notes that leaders must move beyond just “doing things faster" to “doing things differently" to avoid a net loss in competitive value.

  • Task vs. Job Displacement: The impact is forecasted not as the total disappearance of roles, but as the aggressive automation of specific tasks, requiring employees to shift toward “higher-order" reasoning and strategic oversight.

  • The Skills Gap: A critical forecast is the widening gap between the current workforce’s capabilities and the requirements of an AI-integrated business model, making cultural engineering and upskilling the primary leadership challenges.

  • Fear and Anxiety: The structural shift is already reflecting high levels of professional concern, particularly in creative and administrative functions where the perceived threat of displacement is highest.

  • Human-in-the-Loop Requirement: The forecast suggests that human judgment remains the “critical filter" for AI outputs, meaning the most secure roles will be those that can effectively “coach" and validate AI-generated work.

Stay tuned for further updates as we continue to explore the evolving landscape of technological innovation and its impact on businesses worldwide.